TSTP Solution File: SET086^1 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : SET086^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May  4 09:17:58 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.48s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    9 (   7 unt;   2 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   10 (   6 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    5 (   3   ~;   0   |;   0   &;   2   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    2 (   2   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    4 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   10 (   4   ^   4   !;   2   ?;  10   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_26,type,
    singleton: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_36,type,
    esk1_0: $i ).

thf(singleton,axiom,
    ( singleton
    = ( ^ [X1: $i,X4: $i] : ( X4 = X1 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.96XP1CA5K4/E---3.1_30138.p',singleton) ).

thf(thm,conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i] :
    ? [X3: $i] : ( singleton @ X1 @ X3 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.96XP1CA5K4/E---3.1_30138.p',thm) ).

thf(c_0_2,plain,
    ( singleton
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] : Z1 ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[singleton]) ).

thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1: $i] :
      ? [X3: $i] : ( X3 = X1 ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thm]),c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X25: $i] : ( X25 != esk1_0 ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i] : ( X1 != esk1_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem    : SET086^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.6.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 09:52:18 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.47  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.47  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.96XP1CA5K4/E---3.1_30138.p
% 0.19/0.48  # Version: 3.1.0-ho
% 0.19/0.48  # partial match(1): HSSSSMSSMLSNHSN
% 0.19/0.48  # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSMLSNHFN.
% 0.19/0.48  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.48  # Starting new_ho_9 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.48  # Starting post_as_ho1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48  # Starting sh1l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48  # Starting post_as_ho10 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48  # sh1l with pid 30263 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Result found by sh1l
% 0.19/0.48  # partial match(1): HSSSSMSSMLSNHSN
% 0.19/0.48  # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSMLSNHFN.
% 0.19/0.48  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.48  # Starting new_ho_9 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.48  # Starting post_as_ho1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48  # Starting sh1l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.48  # Search class: HUUPF-FFSF00-SHFSMFNN
% 0.19/0.48  # partial match(2): HUUNF-FFSF00-SHSSMFNN
% 0.19/0.48  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.48  # Starting new_ho_10 with 163s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48  # new_ho_10 with pid 30269 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.19/0.48  # partial match(1): HSSSSMSSMLSNHSN
% 0.19/0.48  # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSMLSNHFN.
% 0.19/0.48  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.48  # Starting new_ho_9 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.48  # Starting post_as_ho1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48  # Starting sh1l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.48  # Search class: HUUPF-FFSF00-SHFSMFNN
% 0.19/0.48  # partial match(2): HUUNF-FFSF00-SHSSMFNN
% 0.19/0.48  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.48  # Starting new_ho_10 with 163s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.48  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.48  
% 0.19/0.48  # Proof found!
% 0.19/0.48  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.48  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.48  # Parsed axioms                        : 29
% 0.19/0.48  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Initial clauses                      : 15
% 0.19/0.48  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 14
% 0.19/0.48  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 1
% 0.19/0.48  # Processed clauses                    : 1
% 0.19/0.48  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # ...remaining for further processing  : 1
% 0.19/0.48  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1
% 0.19/0.48  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Generated clauses                    : 1
% 0.19/0.48  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Paramodulations                      : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Equation resolutions                 : 1
% 0.19/0.48  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Total rewrite steps                  : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.19/0.48  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.19/0.48  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.48  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.19/0.48  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.48  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.19/0.48  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48  # Current number of processed clauses  : 0
% 0.19/0.48  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 0
% 0.19/0.48  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.48  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.19/0.48  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.48  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Condensation attempts                : 1
% 0.19/0.48  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 612
% 0.19/0.48  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 29
% 0.19/0.48  
% 0.19/0.48  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.48  # User time                : 0.003 s
% 0.19/0.48  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.48  # Total time               : 0.004 s
% 0.19/0.48  # Maximum resident set size: 1764 pages
% 0.19/0.48  
% 0.19/0.48  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.48  # User time                : 0.004 s
% 0.19/0.48  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.19/0.48  # Total time               : 0.007 s
% 0.19/0.48  # Maximum resident set size: 1748 pages
% 0.19/0.48  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.19/0.48  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------